SubmissionId 60916

Accepted Type
Facilitated and Dedicated Poster

Code
LP12 - 2

Acceptance Declaration
Accept

Additional Information
I declare I have no actual or potential conflict of interest in relation to this program.

Was this work accepted for CCME 2020?
no

Category
General Call (Workshop, Oral Presentation, Poster Presentation)

Type
Oral

Sub Type
Education Innovation

Will the presenter be a:
Resident

Affiliation

Considered for Poster
yes

Title
Junior Pediatric Resident Satisfaction and Confidence in Making Clinical Decisions

Length of Presentation

Background/Purpose
To prepare physicians for independent practice, residency training programs must provide its trainees adequate opportunities to practice making clinical decisions. The University of Calgary Pediatrics Residency Program is working to enhance clinical decision-making opportunities for junior pediatric residents (JR). To date, the patient admission process from the emergency department (ED) to the general pediatrics clinical teaching unit (CTU) has been a senior resident-led role, which ensures safety and efficiency; however, JRs have not been optimally positioned with respect to their role in admissions to practice making clinical decisions.

Summary of the Innovation
Using quality improvement methodology, a series of interventions were implemented into the Alberta Children's Hospital's ED to CTU admission process from August 2019 to June 2020. Online surveys administered to JRs assessed baseline, midway and final time point levels of JR satisfaction with their role in the admission process and JR confidence with their ability to complete an initial patient assessment independently, place admission orders and make decisions on patient care for admissions.

Conclusion
Compared to baseline, final time point levels of JR satisfaction and confidence were increased. Importantly, perceived patient safety in and efficiency of the admission process, measured via online surveys of senior residents at baseline, midway and final timepoints, were greatest at the final time point. These results suggest the interventions implemented in this study were of benefit to JRs. Residency training programs elsewhere can apply the same or similar interventions to enhance clinical decision-making opportunities for residents.

Keyword 1
quality improvement

Keyword 2
clinical decision-making

Level of Training
Post Graduate

Abstract Themes
Teaching and learning

Teaching and Learning
Quality improvement

Additional Theme (First choice)
Postgraduate

Additional Theme (Second Choice)

Additional Theme (Third Choice)

Authors
Presenter
    Roopa Suppiah

Term 1
Yes

Term 2
Yes

Term 3
Yes

Term 4
Yes

Term 5
Yes
x

Loading . . .
please wait . . . loading

Working...