SubmissionId 60824

Accepted Type
Facilitated and Dedicated Poster

Code
P7 - 01

Acceptance Declaration
Accept

Additional Information
I declare I have no actual or potential conflict of interest in relation to this program.

MINI ABSTRACT DESCRIPTION
'Trust me I'm an expert' remains a very valuable therapeutic tool yet how do you use it effectively when the foundation of that expertise has been shaken to its core by the Covid-19 pandemic?

Was this work accepted for CCME 2020?
no

Category
General Call (Workshop, Oral Presentation, Poster Presentation)

Type
Oral

Sub Type
Education Innovation

Will the presenter be a:
Other

Presenter Other
Professor of Medical Education

Affiliation

Considered for Poster
yes

Title
Rethinking Certainty - how to teach 'evidence based' patient care when there is no evidence?

Length of Presentation

Background/Purpose
The Covid-19 pandemic has fundamentally upended our reliance on Evidence Based Medicine (EBM) based on Randomised Controlled Trials (RCT's) leaving clinicians to adjust to practicing medicine when there is no evidence. Also, the necessary switch to creating evidence through 'fast-tracking' research into therapeutic improvisation based on anecdotes is profoundly upsetting to practitioners who have been able to rely on EBM as the foundation of clinical decision making. This issue has been described as a 'Bayesian fatigue' (Rosenquist ( 2020); 'a stress-induced dysphoria experienced' caused when 'knowledge acquired over decades…becomes less important than information being gathered from disparate sources in real-time'. Yet whilst 'Trust me I'm an expert' is a valuable therapeutic tool how do clinicians use it effectively when the foundation of that expertise has been shaken to its core? This presentation will explore how we can enable our students to develop the skills to cope with this 'Bayesian dysphoria' when practicing in a more complicated clinical environment than we could ever have imagined

Summary of the Innovation
The established way to review cases is in Clinical Case conferences. To address Bayesian fatigue students must be able to review clinical cases using critical reflection and analysis based on expressing the 'hunches' and 'best guesses' that are part of clinical decision making. Teaching these critical reflection skills is now a key part of the Masters in Medical Education at Dundee so our student educators can embed this into all clinical teaching

Conclusion
The Covid-19 pandemic has shown that reliance on EBM is a false premise and as educators we must enable students to critically reflect and express the underlying reasons for their 'best guess' clinical decisions

Keyword 1
Uncertainty

Keyword 2
clinical decision making

Keyword 3
critical reflection

Level of Training
General

Abstract Themes
Teaching and learning

Teaching and Learning
  • Clinical Context
  • Collaborative/Peer to Peer
  • Competency-Based Education
  • Distance Learning
  • Experiential Learning

Additional Theme (First choice)
Physician & Medical Student Health and Well-being

Additional Theme (Second Choice)
Professionalism

Additional Theme (Third Choice)
Patient Safety

Authors
Presenter
    Mairi Scott

Term 1
Yes

Term 2
Yes

Term 3
Yes

Term 4
Yes

Term 5
Yes
x

Loading . . .
please wait . . . loading

Working...