SubmissionId 60855

Accepted Type
Oral

Code
OG2-2-4

Was this work accepted for CCME 2020?
yes

Category
General Call (Workshop, Oral Presentation, Poster Presentation)

Type
Oral

Sub Type
Education Research

Will the presenter be a:
Student

Affiliation

Considered for Poster
yes

Title
There's got to be a better way: Institutional Ethnography of intrapartum practices on a Labour & Delivery unit

Length of Presentation

Background/Purpose
Labour and delivery (L&D) units can be contested workplaces with tensions between obstetrician, nursing, and midwifery practices. These tensions can impede communication and raise patient safety concerns. Remedying such tensions requires study of the driving forces contributing to these recurrent problems in interprofessional practices.

Methods
Our institutional ethnography study initially used critical incident analysis reports to identify recurrent issues related to transfers of care (TOC) and consultation requests between midwives and obstetricians. We then mapped the work of midwives, nurses, family physicians, and obstetricians by observing (75 hours) and interviewing them (n=15). We also traced work processes to local (forms and hospital policies) and external texts (national policies and evidence-based guidelines). Final analysis made visible the otherwise hidden links between everyday work of L&D practitioners and higher-level coordinators.

Results
We identified three work processes involving midwives consulting obstetricians: induction with TOC back to midwife, consultation without TOC, and TOC. Three points of disjuncture complicated these processes: a local "3 consult rule", linked to higher-level medical-legal governance and remuneration structures; subjective interpretations of the "4cm dilation rule", a policy meant to standardize practice; and regulations that delayed timing of consultations.

Conclusion
Our study extends existing research demonstrating that medicine-driven governance of midwifery practices can perpetuate interprofessional challenges. For example, the "3 consult rule" was established for patient safety purposes, but in practice can actually function to delay and disrupt work processes, potentially compromising patient safety. While practitioners spoke of the three points of disjuncture as 'laws', most also viewed them as ostensibly modifiable.

Keyword 1
Institutional ethnography

Keyword 2
Labour & Delivery

Keyword 3
Intrapartum Care

Level of Training
General

Abstract Themes
Inter-professional Education

Additional Theme (First choice)
Patient Safety

Additional Theme (Second Choice)
Continuing Medical Education

Additional Theme (Third Choice)
Faculty Development

Authors
Presenter
    Lori Nemoy

Term 1
Yes

Term 2
Yes

Term 3
Yes

Term 4
Yes

Term 5
Yes
x

Loading . . .
please wait . . . loading

Working...