SubmissionId 60750

Accepted Type
Dedicated Poster

Code
LP16 - 04

Acceptance Declaration
Accept

Additional Information
I declare I have no actual or potential conflict of interest in relation to this program.

MINI ABSTRACT DESCRIPTION
This study employs a cross-sectional survey design to evaluate the clinical utility of respiratory clinical examination skills in practice.

Was this work accepted for CCME 2020?
no

Category
General Call (Workshop, Oral Presentation, Poster Presentation)

Type
Poster

Sub Type
Education Research

Will the presenter be a:
Student

Affiliation

Title
Bridging the gap in clinical skills: A pilot study investigating the use of respiratory clinical examination skills in practice.

Length of Presentation

Background/Purpose
There is a paucity of literature that explores whether students use the clinical skills learned during medical school in practice. This study aims to fill this gap, as a greater understanding of clinically relevant examination skills may better focus studying, increase clinical competence, and ease student anxiety.

Methods
We disseminated a 10-minute online anonymized survey to residents and physicians using an open recruitment strategy with convenience and snowball sampling. This survey sought to determine the practical use of respiratory examination skills in the McMaster Clinical Skills guide. We conducted basic quantitative analysis and descriptive content analysis to evaluate results.

Results
From a total of 161 respondents, 148 completed the entire survey. The majority of respondents found all 12 inspection skills to be useful in practice. Tracheal deviation was the only palpation skill found useful (68.63%). No percussion or auscultation skills were seen as useful by a majority, except for auscultating for breath sounds (100% useful). In qualitative analysis, the major theme was that skills should be taught despite minimal use as they help teach disease pathophysiology, help in limited resource settings, and have usefulness in particular situations (e.g., traumas or different specialties).

Conclusion
There is a discrepancy between the clinical skills taught to students and the ones actually used in practice. Despite this, there is still utility in teaching these skills to medical students. Rather than removing skills from the curriculum, a better avenue would be to emphasize maneuvers that are clinically important to help guide preparation for clinical settings.

Keyword 1
Medical Education

Keyword 2
Clinical Skills

Keyword 3
Curriculum

Level of Training
Undergraduate

Abstract Themes
Teaching and learning

Teaching and Learning
  • Clinical Skills
  • Integrated instruction & learning

Additional Theme (First choice)
Undergraduate

Additional Theme (Second Choice)
Assessment

Additional Theme (Third Choice)

Authors
Presenter
    Randi Mao

Term 1
Yes

Term 2
Yes

Term 3
Yes

Term 4
Yes

Term 5
Yes
x

Loading . . .
please wait . . . loading

Working...