Accepted Type
Facilitated and Dedicated Poster
Code
P1 - 03
Acceptance Declaration
Accept
Additional Information
I declare I have no actual or potential conflict of interest in relation to this program.
Was this work accepted for CCME 2020?
yes
Category
General Call (Workshop, Oral Presentation, Poster Presentation)
Type
Oral
Sub Type
Education Research
Will the presenter be a:
Other
Presenter Other
Senior Lecturer
Affiliation
Considered for Poster
yes
Title
Pharmacy students use guided reflection and entrustment (EPA) assessments to appraise 'secret' patient/pharmacist encounters in the selfcare community workplace
Length of Presentation
Background/Purpose
Pharmacists are entrusted to help patients minimize risks and maximize benefits when self-selecting treatment for minor ailments. Patients often initially access the Internet for advice. Undergraduates must understand and assimilate both patient and pharmacist perspectives on their path to self-regulated practice.
Methods
Second year (pre-clinical) students (n= 240) posed as patients seeking a pharmacist's advice in a community pharmacy, after having reviewed Internet sources. Using structured guided reflection, they analyzed relevant aspects of the encounter, completed an EPA assessment of the observed pharmacist and proposed measures to personally optimize implementation of this responsibility when in practice. Perceptions were analyzed from observations, reports, surveys, class discussions and interviews. EPA rankings (anchored to 5 levels of supervision) were tabulated.
Results
Student reflections, as patients, highlighted themes of entrustment and confidence in the pharmacist as an authoritative resource. As prospective pharmacists, they evaluated the clinician in terms of best practice guidelines, competencies demonstrated, barriers observed during the consultation and feelings about their future professional role. EPA reports rated the majority of pharmacists able to practice independently/unsupervised and 20% as role-models/able to supervise others. Time constraints for communication, rather than content expertise, was the primary obstacle.
Conclusion
Students valued this contextual opportunity to directly experience competencies required for patient care prior to their clinical year: subject expertise, communication, collaboration, professionalism, advocacy and scholarship. Assessing practitioners' level of entrustment was considered transformative in reinforcing the importance of expertly performing this professional role with appropriate time management once in practice.
Keyword 1
Entrustment (EPA)
Keyword 2
guided reflection
Keyword 3
assessment
Level of Training
Undergraduate
Abstract Themes
Assessment
Assessment
- Formative
- General
- Self assessment
- Entrustable Professional Activities
Additional Theme (First choice)
Undergraduate
Additional Theme (Second Choice)
Professionalism
Additional Theme (Third Choice)
Assessment
Authors
Presenter
Debra Sibbald
Term 1
Yes
Term 2
Yes
Term 3
Yes
Term 4
Yes
Term 5
Yes