SubmissionId 59484

Accepted Type
Facilitated and Dedicated Poster

Code
P1 - 03

Acceptance Declaration
Accept

Additional Information
I declare I have no actual or potential conflict of interest in relation to this program.

Was this work accepted for CCME 2020?
yes

Category
General Call (Workshop, Oral Presentation, Poster Presentation)

Type
Oral

Sub Type
Education Research

Will the presenter be a:
Other

Presenter Other
Senior Lecturer

Affiliation

Considered for Poster
yes

Title
Pharmacy students use guided reflection and entrustment (EPA) assessments to appraise 'secret' patient/pharmacist encounters in the selfcare community workplace

Length of Presentation

Background/Purpose
Pharmacists are entrusted to help patients minimize risks and maximize benefits when self-selecting treatment for minor ailments. Patients often initially access the Internet for advice. Undergraduates must understand and assimilate both patient and pharmacist perspectives on their path to self-regulated practice.

Methods
Second year (pre-clinical) students (n= 240) posed as patients seeking a pharmacist's advice in a community pharmacy, after having reviewed Internet sources. Using structured guided reflection, they analyzed relevant aspects of the encounter, completed an EPA assessment of the observed pharmacist and proposed measures to personally optimize implementation of this responsibility when in practice. Perceptions were analyzed from observations, reports, surveys, class discussions and interviews. EPA rankings (anchored to 5 levels of supervision) were tabulated.

Results
Student reflections, as patients, highlighted themes of entrustment and confidence in the pharmacist as an authoritative resource. As prospective pharmacists, they evaluated the clinician in terms of best practice guidelines, competencies demonstrated, barriers observed during the consultation and feelings about their future professional role. EPA reports rated the majority of pharmacists able to practice independently/unsupervised and 20% as role-models/able to supervise others. Time constraints for communication, rather than content expertise, was the primary obstacle.

Conclusion
Students valued this contextual opportunity to directly experience competencies required for patient care prior to their clinical year: subject expertise, communication, collaboration, professionalism, advocacy and scholarship. Assessing practitioners' level of entrustment was considered transformative in reinforcing the importance of expertly performing this professional role with appropriate time management once in practice.

Keyword 1
Entrustment (EPA)

Keyword 2
guided reflection

Keyword 3
assessment

Level of Training
Undergraduate

Abstract Themes
Assessment

Assessment
  • Formative
  • General
  • Self assessment
  • Entrustable Professional Activities

Additional Theme (First choice)
Undergraduate

Additional Theme (Second Choice)
Professionalism

Additional Theme (Third Choice)
Assessment

Authors
Presenter
    Debra Sibbald

Term 1
Yes

Term 2
Yes

Term 3
Yes

Term 4
Yes

Term 5
Yes
x

Loading . . .
please wait . . . loading

Working...